Wednesday, November 12, 2014

7 Reasons HR Is Often Misunderstood

-Susan Hertfield-

I don’t pretend to speak for every HR department worldwide, but the HR staff I know are committed to both their employees and their company. They avoid causing employees pain. Here are reasons why employees might perceive the situation differently.

  • The HR staff person is caught daily in a balancing act between the role of employee advocate and the role of company business partner and advocate. And, no, the employee doesn’t often see or understand that the HR person is playing two roles.

    They gauge the HR person by their affect on the employee’s need. As an example, the employee wants HR to make an exception for him; the employee doesn’t realize that an exception for him begins to set a precedent for how the company must treat other employees – employees who may be less deserving of an exception.

  • All information about employees is confidential. Even when the HR staff person handles an issue, whether the issue involved disciplinary measures or just a conversation, the steps taken and the outcomes are confidential.

    An HR employee can tell the complaining employee that the issue was addressed. Because of employee confidentiality, they cannot reveal more. This can leave the complaining employee believing their issue was not addressed. (The outcome of a formal, written complaint, as in sexual harassment charges, is disclosed.)

  • HR staff members need documented evidence that a problem exists. Witnesses are helpful, too, as is more than one employee experiencing the same problem. It is difficult to take action based on one employee’s word, especially if the other party denies the problem.

  • What an employee may see as unreasonable behavior on the part of a manager or another employee, HR may find within acceptable bounds of organizational behavior and expectations. The employees may have a personality or work style conflict. The boss may supervise an independent employee more closely than desired. HR can talk with all parties, but often, no one is wrong.

  • When an employee doesn’t like her job or work goals or experiences a conflict with her supervisor’s management style, HR can’t always find the employee a new job. Additionally, because of the cost of employee onboarding and training, the organization is likely to have policies about how often an employee can change positions. Indeed, proving yourself in the current job is the fastest path to a coveted new job.

  • HR doesn’t know about the promises you say your manager made to you about a raise, a promotion, special time off, or a rewarding assignment, unless the promise was documented in your performance development plan.

    You are welcome to complain to HR if you have addressed the issue with your manager. But, the end story is likely your word against the manager’s word. Is it possible you misunderstood your manager? If not be wary about promises made – when he has demonstrated he doesn’t keep his promises. Work with HR on an internal transfer.

  • HR is not always in charge of making the decision. In fact, the decision you don't like may have been made by their boss or the company president. Good, company-oriented HR people won't blame other managers publicly for decisions with which they may disagree. And, they won't bad-mouth the decisions of their boss or other company managers, so you may never know where the decision was made.

So, an unresponsive, unhelpful HR office that avoids helping employees with their problems is not always the case. (Though I know from my readers that such organizations do exist, let's hope they're rare.) There are legitimate reasons why HR cannot fulfill every employee's wishes.

If the HR staff listens, communicates actively, and informs the employee why a decision is made or an action not taken, employees are much less likely to write asking how to solve their HR horror stories. This information should help your HR staff be less misunderstood by employees.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

A Typical example of Leading Organisational Change

ISSUES /TRENDS




  • Low operations efficiency


  • Low productivity


  • Lack of creativity / ideas from shopfloor/frontlines


  • Lack of competencies


TYPES OF CHANGE





  • Development Change


CHANGE DRIVERS





  • Acquisition of new capabilities


  • Retention of Intellectual Capital


STRATEGIC PRESSURE POINTS (SPP)



a. Organisational Capabilities:



- To roll out a Small Group Activities (SGA) to complement Six Sigma initiatives



- Train executives and supervisors who are assigned as SGA Team Leaders on the subject of Continuous Improvement Tools. e.g. 7 QC Tool, QCC projects.



b. Coordinating System



- Introduce and implement competency based recruitment and selection tool for new talent.



c. Culture



- Launch creativity and innovation month in year XXXX . And, to reward to those who give new/good ideas.



CHANGE EQUATION = A+B+C > Z(R)



A = Individual/company/group level of dissatisfaction of the status quo





  • 360 degree involvement of staff on the idea generation


  • Company wide 10% OPEX reduction exercise


B = Shared Picture (Vision)



"To be the leader in healthcare in the market we shoose to serve"



Strategy





  1. Roll out SGA programs


  2. Launch creativity and innovation program


  3. Introcude and implement competency based recruitment & selection of new talent


C = Acceptable / Doable (1st action steps)





  1. Industry benchmarking on productivity


  2. Training on SGA for leaders and members


  3. Formulate creativity and innovation reward/incentive for excellent and doable ideas from employees


  4. Establish core and leadership competency framework


Z = The Cost (Finance, time, Stress)





  1. Formation of SGA Team at shopfloor - matrix reporting


  2. Innovation month (cost of executing the program)


  3. Cost of SGA training


  4. Cost of establishing Core and Leadership Competencies framework






8 Steps to Transforming your Organisation


  1. Establish sense of urgency

  2. Forming an powerful guiding coalition

  3. Creating a vision

  4. Communicating the vision

  5. Empowering others to act on the vision

  6. Planning for and Creating a Short-Term Wins

  7. Don't Let Up - Consolidate improvement & producing still more change...

  8. Make it stick - Institutuionalizing New Approaches

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

The Process of Change

Unfreeze;

Analyze current situation




  • Remove resistance


  • Motivate change


Change;



Introduce new bahavior





  • Manage control


  • Manage transition


Refreeze;



Stabilize new practice





  • Manage power


  • Institutionalize change


Dealing with Resistance to Change





  • Working with stakeholders


  • Conduct stakeholders analysis


  • Dealing with response to change (Intelectual and emotional)


Individual Resistance





  1. Denial


  2. Resistance


  3. Exploration


  4. Commitment


Steps in Intellectual & Emotional Response to Change





  1. Listen


  2. Explore & Evaluate


  3. Make a Decision


  4. Take Action


Building stakeholders support through communication





  1. Share the change vision


  2. Build understanding


  3. Clarify personal meaning


  4. Build commitment




Note:



We need to establish COMMON GROUND RULES or FRAMEWORK for your team



Change Management Skills:





  • Adaptability


  • Strategic focus


  • Results Focus


  • Foster Collaborative Approach


  • Facilitate Openness & understanding


  • Encourage learning


Note:



Facilitating Openness & Understanding requires an ability to;





  1. Be prepared and focused


  2. Hear in all


  3. Clarify the message


  4. Confirm the message


  5. Move forward


Monday, October 3, 2011

Leading Organisational Change -1

Types of change






  • Evolutionary adaptation



  • Development change



  • Transitional change



  • Drastic change



  • Transformational change



Change drivers







  • Environmental factors



  • Marketplace factors



  • Technology



  • Customer needs



  • Business diversification



  • Expansion



  • Need for increase profitability



  • Acquisition of new capability



  • Retention or acquisition of intelectual capital



Strategic pressure points (SPP)







  • Business Strategy



  • Organisation Structure



  • Organisational Capabilities



  • Culture



  • Coordinating System



Note: A SPP is a change that impacts in a significant way at least 2 of the above characteristics.







Change Equation is A+B+C > Z(R)




A = Individual/organisation/group level of dissatisfaction with the status quo




B = A clear and shared picture of better future




C = Acceptable and doable 'First Action Steps'




Z = The cost (Financial, Time, Stress) of making change




R = Resistance level




Sunday, October 2, 2011

What characterises effective leadership in the middle to senior levels in Organisation

Based on research findings by Joan Bragar

The 3 primary qualities of leadership needed for steering organisations through periods of turbulence and uncertainty:
1. Taking personal responsibility for initiating change
2. Creating a vision and strategy for the organisation
3. Trusting and empowering others

Important conclusions from the research findings:


  • Without leadership, organisations falter in times of change

  • Leadership is critical from the boardroom to the shop floor

  • Positions and title bear no relationship to leadership performance

  • Leadership involve interdependence more than individualism

  • Leaders inspire others to take on leadership tasks

  • Outstanding management skills are an essential component of leadership

  • Leadership is contextual. Effective leadership is grounded in an extensive knowledge of business environment, and intimate understanding of the industry, company, and work group, and strong sense of organisation's strategy, culture and values.

  • Practical experience in conducting leadership training

  • Leadership is not a style, it is action

The study pinpointed the 20 practices in 4 distinct areas which correlated most highly with leadership performance and that could be taught most effectively, and they were tested for relevance and impact with individuals in over 100 large companies


INTERPRETING


The first set of actions helps leaders interpret the conditions, internal and external, to their organisation, that affect them and their workgroup. These practice include:



  1. Seeking information from as many sources as possible

  2. Knowing how your own work supports the organisation's overall strategy

  3. Analysing how well the members of the group work together

  4. Knowing the capabilities and motivations of the individuals in the workgroup

  5. Knowing your own capabilities and motivations

SHAPING


The next group of practices enables leaders to shape a vision and strategy to give meaning to the group work:



  1. Involving the right people in developing the workgroup's strategy

  2. Standing up for what is important

  3. Adjusting plans and actions as necessary in turbulent situations

  4. Communicating the strategy of the organisation as a whole

  5. Creating a positive picture of the future of the workgroup

MOBILISING


Leaders use these practices to mobilise individuals with ideas, skills and values around a common mission by:



  1. Communicating clearly the results expected from others

  2. Appealing to people's hearts and minds to lead them in a new direction

  3. Demonstrating care for the members of the workgroup

  4. Demonstrating confidence in the abilities of others

  5. Letting people know how they are progressing towards the group goals

INSPIRING



  1. Promoting the development of people's talent

  2. Recognising the contributions of others

  3. Enabling others to feel and act like leaders

  4. Stimulating the thinking of others

  5. Building enthusiasm about projects and assignments

Note:


Joan Bragar is the Founder and Principal of Boston-based workplace consulting and leadership coaching practice.




Saturday, September 24, 2011

The 4 Imperatives of Great Leaders

Inspire TRUST:
Great leaders create personal credibility and earn the legitimate TRUST of others.

Clarify PURPOSE
Great leaders work effectively with others to create a clear and compelling purpose that is focused on customer needs, strategically aligned and financially viable.

Align Systems
Great leaders build the organisation's capability to consistently achieve its goal, attract and retain talent, improve work processes and develop intense customer loyalty.

Unleash Talent
Great Leaders tap the full potential of the individual, respecting the four dimensions of the whole person. If leaders neglect any of these four need areas, they turn people into object that must be managed, not motivated, controlled, not unleashed.

Source: Franklin Covey

Building a Great Organisation

To build a great organisation, you need great leaders and effective people who execute the organisation's mission with excellence.


  • Great leaders who inspire trust are essential. Without them, there is no vision of where to go; Nor strategy nor systems for getting there. But great leaders are not enough.

  • Effective individuals are essential. Without effective people, the organisation is destined for mediocrity or worse. But effective individuals are not enough.

  • Without a shared process for focusing on and executing the organisation's mission, the most inspired and capable people fall short of greatness. But with such a process, great people can build something important and enduring.

In summary...


Great Leaders are leaders who:



  1. Inspires TRUST

  2. Clarify PURPOSE

  3. Align SYSTEMS

  4. Unleash TALENT

Effective Individuals are indivuduals who:



  1. Are FOCUSED and DISCIPLINED

  2. Are TRUSTWORTHY

  3. Possess good BUSINESS JUDGEMENT

  4. Are PROACTIVE in ATTITUDE and ACTIONS

  5. WORKS well with OTHERS

  6. Are GOOD LISTENERS and COMMUNICATORS

Institutionalised Focus and Execution: Organisational processes and disciplines that create CLARITY, COMMITMENT, TRANSLATION, ENABLING, SYNERGY and ACCOUNTABILITY


Organisational Greatness is an organisation that possess:



  • Sustained Superior Performance

  • Loyal Customers

  • Engaged EMployees

  • Distinctive Contribution

Source: Franklin Covey


Delivering "HR with attitude" in 2010: UK HR's finest hour? (XpertHR - Employment Intelligence)#more

Delivering "HR with attitude" in 2010: UK HR's finest hour? (XpertHR - Employment Intelligence)#more

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Southwest Airlines Seven Secret of Success

What's the airline-industry jargon for unconventional wisdom? Southwest Airlines.

By some estimates, the country's major carriers have consumed perhaps $100 billion in capital during the past decade, but Southwest Airlines continues to be profitable. It's been in the black for 33 consecutive years and, last week, for the 127th consecutive quarter, it paid a modest dividend. Its balance sheet, with about $3 billion in cash on hand and $600 million in available credit, is the envy of an otherwise fuel-price-ravaged industry.

Its competitors among the network carriers—American, United, Delta, Continental, Northwest and US Airways—are shrinking passenger capacity by more than 10 percent and grounding hundreds of aircraft starting in the fall. Southwest will add a handful of daily flights. It will take delivery of another dozen aircraft next year and still plans to grow by 2 to 3 percent. And Southwest now carries more passengers annually (101 million last year) than any other U.S. carrier, a nifty trick for an airline that didn't fly outside Texas at the dawn of deregulation in 1978.

Even the fickle financial markets, which have long discounted Southwest's relentless growth and steady profits, have finally taken note. As oil prices doubled in the past year, share prices of the six network carriers have slid, with the drop-offs ranging from 76 to 94 percent. Southwest's decline has been more modest, within a point of the Dow's 21 percent 52-week drop. As a result, Southwest's market capitalization yesterday (about $9.7 billion) is now more than the combined $5.7 billion market cap of its Big Six competitors.

What does Southwest know that no one else in airlines does? It keeps things simple and consistent, which drives costs down, maximizes productive assets, and helps manage customer expectations.

One Plane Fits All

Unlike the network carriers and their commuter surrogates, which operate all manner of regional jets, turboprops, and narrow-body and wide-body aircraft, Southwest flies just one plane type, the Boeing 737 series. That saves Southwest millions in maintenance costs—spare-parts inventories, mechanic training and other nuts-and-bolts airline issues. It also gives the airline unique flexibility to move its 527 aircraft throughout the route network without costly disruptions and reconfigurations.

Point-to-Point Flying

Network carriers rely on a hub-and-spoke system, which laboriously collects passengers from "spoke" cities, flies them to a central "hub" airport, and then redistributes them to other spokes. Not Southwest. Most of its flying is nonstop between two points. That minimizes the time that planes sit on the ground at crowded, delay-prone hubs and allows the average Southwest aircraft to be in the air for more than an hour longer each day than a similarly sized jet flown by a network carrier. Southwest's avoid-the-hubs strategy also pays dividends in on-time operations. According to FlightStats, Southwest's 78 percent on-time performance in June is eight percentage points higher than the industry average and higher than that of any of its major competitors.

Simple In-Flight Service

Business travelers haven't always loved Southwest's über-simple service, but it's looking better and better as competitors cut back. There is just one class of service, a decent coach cabin that is slightly more spacious than those of Southwest's competitors. There are no assigned seats. There have never been meals, just beverages and snacks. Keeping it basic allows Southwest to unload a flight, clean and restock the plane, and board another flight full of passengers in as little as 20 minutes compared with as much as 90 minutes on a network airline. Airline efficiency experts say that the savings allow each Southwest jet to fly an extra flight per day. Extra flights mean extra revenue.

No Frills, No Fees

As other carriers have rushed to remove perks and pile on fees and restrictions, Southwest has kept its customer proposition streamlined and transparent. The airline only sells one-way fares and only in a few price "buckets." That not only keeps costs down—complex fare structures are expensive to manage—it convinces fliers that they are getting value for money. Prices are all-inclusive too. Southwest doesn't have fuel surcharges, doesn't charge for standby travel or ticket changes, and continues to permit travelers to check two pieces of luggage free. And since every seat on every flight is virtually identical, travelers know exactly what they will get when they make a purchase.

Strong Management

The public face of Southwest Airlines for a generation, hard-drinking, chain-smoking, always-leave-'em laughing Herb Kelleher, finally stepped away from the carrier earlier this year. Kelleher's bonhomie masked the discipline that Southwest has had throughout its history. The airline has always avoided fads and eschewed anything that increased costs or complicated the basic travel proposition. When it has changed—last year it ended its infamous cattle-call boarding process to favor its most frequent fliers and highest-fare customers—it has done so without slowing down the movement of aircraft. Management ranks are lean, but well compensated and, most importantly, productive. I once calculated that the top executives of Southwest generated 10 times more revenue per dollar of compensation than did the C-suite types at some of the network carriers.

A Relatively Happy Workforce

Network carriers have railed for decades about the power of their employee unions. But guess who's the most unionized carrier in the nation? Southwest, of course. The airline says that 87 percent of its employees belong to a union. Southwest has never had a strike, and now that the network carriers have whacked away at salaries and benefits, Southwest staffers are generally the highest paid in the industry. But since Southwest has about 30 percent fewer employees per aircraft than its network competitors, it has the lowest non-fuel C.A.S.M. (cost per available seat mile) of any of the major carriers.

Aggressive Fuel Hedging

Rampaging fuel prices now represent around 40 percent of an airline's costs, but, as usual, Southwest Airlines has been ahead of the curve. Since 1999, the airline's aggressive fuel-hedging program has saved it an estimated $3.5 billion. In the first quarter, for example, it paid $1.98 a gallon for fuel, approximately a dollar less than its network competitors. And Southwest's future position is admirable: It is 70 percent hedged at $51 a barrel through the end of the year and 55 percent hedged at the same price next year.

In a world of $140-a-barrel oil, suggesting that any airline is a guaranteed winner is beyond hubris. But this much can be said: Southwest Airlines is sitting on a pile of cash and fuel hedges and has a proven and easily adaptable service model. And history shows that Southwest has comfortably survived every airline-industry downturn, then grown rapidly and profited hugely when the business cycle turns.

By Joe Brancatelli